There’s a popular saying that indicates trying the same thing repeatedly but expecting a different result, is the definition of insanity. If this premise is true, then the Democrat Party is wacko. After listening to the vast majority of them speak, the idea is further cemented.
However, for the sake of this argument, we’ll target Democrats’ insatiable desire to label President Donald Trump as a criminal. Their litany of charges borders on the preposterous. Things started with the Russia collusion hoax.
Democrats tried to stream roll then-candidate Trump using the Hillary Clinton-driven sham. After that failed, they redirected the narrative, changing it into a two-year witch hunt called the Mueller probe. The entire scam was a scheme to undermine the Trump Presidency.
It failed miserably because it wasn’t true. However, did that stop the radical left from wading into yet another bogus lie? Not on your life. After Russiagate came the fabricated phone conversation with the president of Ukraine.
Just like the Russia hoax, it was a bogus attempt by Democrats to paint the successful president as a criminal. He wasn’t. After the crooked 2020 presidential election, Democrats went after President Trump again.
They tried to make up a false narrative about a phone conversation he had with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Not only was the substance of the conversation mutated, but the motivation behind it was also a complete lie.
But like good lunatics, Democrats haven’t given up the ghost. They’re at it again. This time they have the help of a couple of Republican turncoats, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger. They’re part of another sham to try to prove President Trump committed a crime. He didn’t.
The problem isn’t so much that he didn’t commit any crime. The issue is with Democrats trying to hoodwink the American people into thinking he did. They’re going all out this time. The sham January 6 commission has hired an ABC executive to choreograph their sham.
The January 6 commission hearings are somewhere between a Tales from the Darkside episode and an airing of a B-budget Lifetime movie. It’s a profound example of Hollywood supported political theater.
The problem is that it should be classified under the “comedy genre.” What they’re attempting to do is ludicrous. First, even if President Trump did dispute the 2020 election, there is no crime in doing so. Besides that, he’s correct.
The election was both manipulated and stolen. Second, the chaos that metastasized out of the otherwise peaceful January 6 protests is not his fault. All anyone has to do is listen to what the man actually said, not what the liberals want people to think he said.
Of course, one of the biggest quacks is Adam Schiff. Schiff said, via the Associated Press, “I would like to see the Justice Department investigate any credible allegation of criminal activity on the part of Donald Trump.” Good for you, Adam. Go for it.
No competent prosecutor would touch the case. There is no evidence to use towards prosecuting such a charge against President Trump because no evidence exists. But even if the crooked Biden DOJ tried to fabricate a case against President Trump, they should use caution.
An old Confucius proverb says, “Seek revenge, and you should dig two graves, one for yourself.” There will never be criminal charges filed against President Trump because they can’t. There isn’t any evidence because none exists. It would be a slam dunk loss.
But they know that already. The Democrats’ January 6 Primetime sham is an exercise in futility. They cannot and will not ever push this case into a true American courtroom. There would be contradictory or truthful evidence.
There would be cross-examination of their sham witnesses. The whole scam would be exposed. But in the meantime, Americans are watching their elected leaders participate in a worthless waste of time. At least they’re adept at doing something.
They certainly aren’t capable of governing our nation. It’s time for some new actors in this sad comedy called the U.S. Congress. In the meantime, we get more liberal fiction, stories which are inconsistent with history and devoid of facts.