NYT Reporter Reveals SHOCKING Information Regarding Jan 6th

If you’re not following Project Veritas, you need to. This week they struck again, getting the New York Times to admit that their crazy accusations surrounding the January 6th protests was really just a mainstream media and FBI love fest in disguise here.

This time, it’s NYT National Security Correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg. He confirms what we have known for so long.

According to Project Veritas,

Project Veritas published a bombshell video on Tuesday showing Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times correspondent, Matthew Rosenberg, speaking about the events of January 6, 2021, in a way that contradicts his own reporting.

Rosenberg, who covers national security matters for the Times says on the undercover video that “there were a ton of FBI informants among the people who attacked the Capitol.”

This revelation is a break from Rosenberg’s reporting on the matter where he characterized such a notion of FBI informants in the crowd as a “reimagining of Jan. 6.”

This was not the only time Rosenberg’s commentary to Project Veritas’ undercover reporter directly contradicted his own published words. Despite telling a Veritas journalist that January 6 was “no big deal,” his article says that downplaying the events of that day was “the next big lie.”

Soundbites of Rosenberg published Tuesday show him saying, “It’s not a big deal as they [media] are making it, because they were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Rosenberg said:

“There were a ton of FBI informants amongst the people who attacked the Capitol.“

It was like, me and two other colleagues who were there [January 6] outside and we were just having fun!”

“I know I’m supposed to be traumatized, but like, all these colleagues who were in the [Capitol] building and are like ‘Oh my God it was so scary!’ I’m like, ‘f*ck off!’”

“They were making too big a deal. They were making this an organized thing that it wasn’t.”

Send this to a friend